Skip to content
Politics

Tinubu Removed Fuel Subsidy Without Looking At Possible Issues – Kwankwaso

Key Takeaways

  • Nigeria Democratic Congress vice-presidential candidate, Rabiu Kwankwaso, criticised President Bola Tinubu for removing fuel subsidy at inauguration without considering cushioning measures for Nigerians.
  • Speaking on Arise Television on Wednesday, Kwankwaso said Tinubu removed subsidy immediately, triggering the consequences expected and plunging Nigeria into a total economic mess.
  • On the Untold Stories podcast, Kwankwaso again opposed state police, warning that more arms in citizens’ hands will fuel disputes and reduce peace.

The vice-presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Rabiu Kwankwaso, has berated President Bola Tinubu for removing the fuel subsidy without considering the cushioning effects.

He lamented that Tinubu had plunged Nigeria into a complete economic mess.

Naija News reports that Kwankwaso shared his reservations during an appearance on Arise Television on Wednesday.

He asserted that Tinubu’s decision to remove the subsidy on fuel during his inauguration ruined Nigeria’s economy.

He said, “Bola Tinubu decided to remove the subsidy, and the consequences we thought would happen certainly happened.

“He removed it immediately without looking at all the possible issues. That is how we found ourselves in this total mess economically.”

The former Kano governor insisted that Nigerians deserve to buy fuel at a cheaper price.

Meanwhile, Kwankwaso has restated his opposition to the creation of state police in Nigeria.

Naija News reports that the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) Vice Presidential Candidate said the renewed demand for state police was largely driven by the inability of the existing federal policing system to adequately address the country’s security problems.

The former Minister of Defence, who spoke on the Untold Stories podcast, said the worsening security situation had forced governments at different levels to look for additional ways to protect citizens.

According to him, the idea of state police emerged because of what he described as the failure of the federal or national police to effectively deal with insecurity

He said: “I have always been against state police, and I can tell you the issue of state police came because of the failure of the federal or national police. I think it’s one of the big mistakes that government is doing.

“But one can understand if there is any failure, nobody wants to take responsibility. It’s only when there is success, everybody, even somebody who is one thousand kilometers away from it, will be claiming. We can see how things have reversed themselves to the extent that leaders in this country are telling their citizens to go and purchase arms. They go and own arms to protect themselves. It has gone that bad.

“And as long as people have too many arms in their hands, I can tell you there will hardly be any peace. Because even little disputes between neighbors or even husband and wife, I can tell you one may decide to go and take the arms and use it.”

Join the conversation

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.