Bayelsa: Sylva Makes Demands After INEC Removed His Name From Governorship Candidate List

The counsel to the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Bayelsa State, Timipre Sylva, Ahmed Raji, has written to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to immediately withdraw the amended list of candidates released for the poll.

Raji described the decision of INEC to remove Sylva’s name from the list of governorship candidates in the state as prejudicial.

Naija News recalls that INEC on Wednesday, released an amended list of candidates vying in the election without including Sylva’s name.

Justice Donatus Okorowo of a Federal High Court, Abuja, had, on Oct. 9 in a judgment, disqualified Sylva, a former governor of the state, from contesting the election.

Sylva, who was not pleased with the judgment, approached the Court of Appeal, through his lawyer, Raji, to challenge the decision of the court.

But while the appeal is pending, INEC released a list of candidates for the poll excluding the APC candidate’s names.

Raji in a letter to the commission dated Oct. 25, said he had the firm instruction of Sylva to respectfully demand the immediate withdrawal of the amended list.

The senior lawyer said it was shocking for the INEC to release such publication when the judgement the commission acted upon had already been appealed against at the Court of Appeal.

He said, “Dear sir, you will recall that the judgment in issue, that arose from the above suit was delivered on the 9th of October,2023 and our client, being an ardent and firm believer in the efficacy of the judiciary and the rule of law, immediately filed an appeal within 24 hours of the judgment, on the 10th October, 2023.

“In addition to the notice of appeal, our client expeditiously compiled the record of appeal and transmitted same in less than 10 days.

“The appeal was successfully entered on the 18th of October 2023, with Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CS/1060/2023.

“The above being the case, the commission, as a respected arbiter and law-abiding institution, is expected to respectfully wait for the outcome of the appeal, before taking any step that may be prejudicial to any of the parties, particularly, our client.

“This is in view of the fact that the parties that went to court are not candidates in the forthcoming election, unlike our client. In other words, they do not have anything to lose, rather, they are fighting proxy battles to deny our client and his party the opportunity to participate in the forthcoming election.

“We know that the Commission has always been consistent in a matter like this, to wait until the entire appellate process and proceedings are completed, one way or the other.”