Connect with us
Advertisement

Gist

Court Orders Kidnap Kingpin, Evans To Refund €233,000 Ransom To Victim

Published

on

Advertisement

Convicted notorious kidnap kingpin, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike, popularly known as Evans, has been asked to refund the sum of €233,000 ransom he collected from one of his victims, Chief Donatus Dunu.

Naija News recalls that was arrested in 2017 and was tried several times before he was finally convicted of the charges against him.

One of the victims of Evans’ criminal act, Dunu who is a renowned pharmacist had since filed a suit against the convict, seeking the court to order the defendant to refund the ransom he collected from him.

The claimant was reportedly abducted on February 14, 2017, and was held hostage before he managed to escape from captivity. Upon his escape, Dunu alleged that Defendant collected the sum of €233,000 as ransom before he escaped from abduction.

Advertisement

Consequently, the claimant, who is the CEO of Maydon Pharmaceutical Company filed a suit demanding the return of the sum of £223,000 he paid as ransom while in the custody of the kidnap kingpin.

The claimant also demanded the sum of N50 million as damages.

In his testimony before the Lagos State High court, sitting at the Tafawa Balewa Square, on Lagos Island, the claimant said Evans had also asked him to instruct his brothers, Anslem Dunu and Innocent Dunu to pay the ransom.

Advertisement

He stated that the sum of €233,000 was paid but the Defendant refused to release him. He eventually escaped from captivity.

He was not cross-examined by the defendant despite several adjournments for cross-examination.

The claimant’s brother, Anslem Dunu also gave evidence and adopted his witness statement on oath sworn to on 16th May 2022.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In his evidence, he told the court that on 14th February 2017, another of his brother, Innocent Dunu informed him that the Claimant was abducted.

The next day he said he spoke with the Claimant on the phone who instructed him to pay his abductors N100 million as a ransom for his release.

He stated that the abductors later demanded £1 million. His relation, one Uchenna Okagwu delivered €233,000 to the abductors. He was also not cross-examined.

However, in his defence, the defendant contended that the strength of the Claimant’s case is predicated majorly upon criminal trial against him and others.

The defendant also submitted that the only evidence before the court as to the payment of €233,000 and to whom if any it was paid was the evidence of Uchenna Okagwu who allegedly delivered the money to the abductors.

He added that in the criminal trial, Uchenna Okagwu testified that he dropped the said sum on the ground and fled and that he did not see anybody or delivered the money to anyone.

He argued that the evidence of Uchenna Okagwu who delivered the said ransom to the abductors which is the only direct evidence must pass the test of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant submitted that the judgment delivered by Justice Hakeem Oshodi on the 25th day of February 2022 is now the subject of an Appeal at the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division.

In his judgment, Justice Ogunjobi held that the defendant gave inconsistent evidence and cannot be regarded as a witness of truth.

Delivering judgement on Wednesday, Justice Olukayode Ogunjobi ordered the convicted kidnapper to pay N50 million as general damages in favour of the Claimant.

The Judge also stated that having watched the demeanour of the defendant in the witness box while giving evidence, he concluded that his evidence cannot be trusted.

Justice Ogunjobi held “Its settled law that no witness who gives materially inconsistent evidence on oath is entitled to the honour of being accorded with any credibility and as such does not deserve to be treated as a truthful witness.

“Besides adducing conflicting pieces of evidence on oath, I have watched the demeanour of the Defendant in the witness box when giving evidence and concluded that the Defendant is not a witness of truth. I do not believe his evidence. I accept the unchallenged and uncontroverted evidence of the Claimant and his witnesses. The evidence supports the reliefs sought by the Claimant.

“Consequently, the Claimant is entitled to be paid or repaid and or recover from the Defendant, the sum of Euro 233,000 (Two Hundred and Thirty-Three Euros) ransom coercively paid by the Claimant to Defendant when the Defendant kidnapped the Claimant in the year 2017 and held the Claimant hostage for months.

“The sum of N50,000,000.00 (Fifty Million Naira) is awarded as general damages in favour of the Claimant against the Defendant.

“Post-judgment interest is awarded on the said sum of Euro233,000 at the rate of 10% per annum from judgment i.e. 14th of February, 2023 until final liquidation. The adjudged said sum of Euros €233,000 and N50,000,000 is hereby ordered to be paid or recovered from the Assets of the Defendant. This is the Judgment of the Court.”

The court however refused the claim for prejudgement interest of 40 per cent per annum on the €233,000.