Connect with us
Advertisement

Nigeria News

Buhari Does Not Have Constitutional Power To Pardon Nyame, Dariye – Ozekhome

Published

on

Why Buhari Pardoned Joshua Dariye, Jolly Nyame, Others - Presidency (Full Details)
Advertisement

Popular Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mike Ozekhome has faulted the presidential pardon granted to a former Governor of Taraba State, Jolly Nyame, and a former governor of Plateau State, Joshua Dariye.

Naija News reports that the Council of State meeting presided over by President Muhammadu Buhari pardoned the former governors, who were jailed for corruption, alongside 157 others on Thursday.

In a statement issued on Saturday, Ozekhome said President Buhari and the council of state do not have the constitutional power to grant prerogative mercy to the former governors.

Ozekhome asserted that the president has violated the provisions of the Constitution and his oaths of office and allegiance to defend the constitution with the action.

Advertisement

The senior lawyer stated that the president acted beyond his constitutional powers by granting Dariye and Nyame a pardon on the grounds of age and ill-health.

Ozekhome pointed out that only their state governors can grant the two former governors a pardon, since the offences for which they were tried and convicted fall under state laws.

According to the SAN, Nyame and Dariye were tried and convicted under sections 115,119 and 309 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, LFN, 1990, which is a state law.

Advertisement

The statement reads: “The offences under which they were tried and convicted fall under state laws which took place after the promulgation of the 1999 constitution during which time they were governors.

“Specifically, they were tried and convicted under sections 115,119 and 309 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, LFN, 1990, obviously an existing State law within the meaning, import and true purport of sections 315(1)(b) and 318 of the 1999 Constitution.

“It becomes clear therefore that only the governors of Plateau and Taraba states could have legally and rightly granted pardon to Dariye and Nyame, invoking section 212 of the Constitution and not Mr president under section 175 of the Constitution.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The act of granting amnesty or pardon though discretionary, this discretion must be exercised judiciously and in the best interest of the country, so as not to create doubts in and dampen the confidence of, the citizenry in the national moral fabric, and in the fight against corruption.

“The purpose of criminal prosecution is to secure justice, not only for the accused but also for the victims of crimes and the State; and to some extent get reparation and restitution for the victims while deterring others from going the same route.

“I dare say that in these two instances, both the President and the Council of State goofed and abused their undoubted constitutional powers and privileges.

“A constitutional issue as volatile as this could have been better managed if the minders of the president had told him the embarrassment this could cause the government in the estimation of the comity of nations. And it is doing just that.

“Granted that the constitution gives the president and the governors the power of prerogative to pardon criminals in deserving circumstances, must it be done in the vulgar way and manner the instant case was handled?

“In fairness to the president, not all the 159 convicts and ex-convicts granted presidential pardon are politicians. But, the most prominent of them are the two former governors.

“That is what has led to the national ruckus, bedlam and hoopla. This is because it could be argued (and rightly too), that the main essence of the last meeting of the council of state was to give an imprimatur to, and grant pardon to the two political heavyweights, while making up the number with some insignificant lightweight ones, using garnished veneer and sleight of hand.

“The president by so doing has certainly violated the provisions of the Constitution and his oaths of office and allegiance to defend the constitution.

“This recent pardon, in my humble view, is the worst way to fight corruption. It will further water, nurture and elevate corruption to a fundamental objective.”