EFCC, Police, DSS Restrained From Arresting Fani-Kayode, Odumakin

An Abuja High Court has restrained the Department of State Services and the Nigeria Police from arresting or detaining former Aviation Minister, Femi Fani-Kayode, and Afenifere spokesman, Yinka Odumakin.

News Agency Of Nigeria revealed that the order was issued by Justice John Tsoho, on Monday, in respect to the application that was argued by Mr Chukwuma Machukwu-Ume SAN on behalf of the duo.

Machukwu-Ume while speaking in court claimed that the three security agencies were planning to arrest and detain Fani-Kayode and Odumakin following the statement they made about the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen.

He said, “The spokesman of the EFCC, Mr Tony Orilede, was alleged to have made the threat to arrest them publicly at a conference where he represented the EFCC chairman.

“He said they are doing everything possible to arrest these two gentlemen just for speaking their minds.

“The EFCC is established to pursue corruption and not comments made by Nigerians, expressing themselves,” he said.

Machukwu claimed that his clients had gone into hiding for fear of being arrested for merely expressing their freedom of speech, alleging that the lives of their family members had also been affected by the alleged threat.

The lawyer told the court that the application was brought pursuant to Section 6 (6)(b) and Section 46 of the 1999 Constitution as well as Order 4 Rules 3 of the Fundamental Rights Procedure Rules.”

He called on the court to grant restraining order from arresting and detaining his clients pending the determination of the application on notice.

Justice Tsoho said that he was satisfied that the applicants had made a case that their lives were being threatened.

“I am satisfied that the applicants have made out a case for the court’s intervention.

“Accordingly, the respondents are restrained from either arresting or detaining the applicants on grounds of the applicants’ public statements pending the determination of the application on notice,” the judge ruled.

The matter was adjourned by the judge until February 4.