Senators Give Mixed Reaction Over Buhari’s Firm Refusal To Sign Electoral Bill.
The All Progressives Congress (APC) lawmaker gave this insight in a phone interview with newsmen in Abuja on Friday night.
Article 2 of the protocol forbids member countries from making “substantial modification” to their electoral laws less than six months to elections “except with the consent of a majority of political actors”.
Omo-Agege, who is a staunch supporter of the President, noted that with the elections less than three months away, signing the bill would violate the ECOWAS instrument.
As at now the presidential and National Assembly elections are slated for Feb. 16, 2019, while those of governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections will hold on March 2, Naija News reports.
Omo-Agege said, “I have yet to see the president’s letter to the Senate, but this bill means so much to Mr President. On a good day he would want to sign it.
“However, without even seeing the reasons he has advanced so far, I am aware of the challenges posed by the ECOWAS protocol.
“I don’t know if that is part of the reasons he has advanced, but with the bill coming two months or thereabout before the election, assenting to it will breach the protocol.”
However Naija News earlier reports that Buhari did not mention the ECOWAS instrument as part of his reasons for declining assent to the bill for the fourth time.
The president’s latest decision came in a letter dated Dec. 6, 2018 and addressed to both chambers of the National Assembly.
He said signing the amendment bill with elections close by could “create some uncertainty about the legislation to govern the process”.
“Any real or apparent change to the rules this close to the elections may provide an opportunity for disruption and confusion in respect of which law governs the electoral process,” he stated.
Buhari, therefore, asked the National Assembly to specifically state in the bill that the amended Electoral Act would come into effect after the 2019 general elections.
On his part, Sen. Peter Nwaoboshi, who represents Delta North on the platform of the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), said the reasons given by the president were “untenable”.
“It is not a good reason for him not to sign the bill because the Senate worked with INEC (Independent National Electoral Commission) in preparing that bill.
“If INEC felt otherwise, they would have advised us when we were working on it.
“You are aware of the controversy that this issue of amendment of the act has generated, with people accusing the Senate of not wanting to amend the act.
“We amended it, but he declined assent the first, second and third time; he made certain observations, which we agreed with.
“We sent it again, and the reason he is giving now is that it will disrupt the election. It is really unfortunate,” he said.
An Abuja-based lawyer and civil rights campaigner, Mr Frank Tietie, said the credibility of the 2019 elections was at stake without the compulsory use of card readers as proposed in the bill.
Although, INEC has been using the card reader for elections since 2015, there is no provision for the technology in the extant electoral law, making its use optional.
Tietie said, “Without the card reader and electronic transmission of results, our elections have been subjected to might, brute force and the power of money.
“Card readers and electronic transmission of results have totally eliminated that, and there is need for a legal force to that.
“This is what the amendment seeks. Buhari’s refusal to allow the card reader and electronic transmission of results will only lead to electoral compromise,” he said.
In September, Sen. Ita Enang, Buhari’s Senior Special Assistant (SSA), said the president had no problem with the use of the card reader contrary to allegations by the opposition.